The following is a guest blog from Mike DeGrandpre, a long-time Coalition supporter and a professor at The University of Montana

The Rio Bio-Bio from our apartment building in San Pedro de al Paz. Concepcion is across the river on the right.

We’re three months into our nine-month stay in Concepcion, a city, like Missoula, with a river running through it. The Rio Bio-Bio in no way resembles our Clark Fork, however.  It is more than a half-mile wide here, just before the desembocadura, the place where the river meets the sea.  Although shorter, at 240 miles compared to the Clark Fork’s 310 miles, and about a third of the drainage area, mean flows peak at a whopping 70,000 cfs.   These winter spates, or floods, are driven by rain—surprisingly not by spring runoff from the snowy Andes that sit just 100 miles away.

In my almost daily commute across the river, my perception is that the Bio-Bio is valued for utilitarian, not recreational, purposes.  I have not seen a single boat of any kind and only one fisherman walking along the bank.  The river here is dotted with paper mills and other industrial development.  But just a short drive upstream reveals that a wild beauty still exists, the impression made stronger by the breadth of the river and the Cretaceous-looking foliage along its banks.

Further upstream two large hydroelectric dams have recently been built, a trend opposite of the Clark Fork.   The construction of these dams, which flooded lands of the indigenous Mapuches and buried popular white water areas, is a testament to the corporate strength and weak environmental laws here in Chile.  Other environmental worries resonate with those of the Clark Fork: pollution from paper mills, municipal wastes, and urbanization.  But the Bio-Bio has been spared a similar mining legacy – most mines are in northern Chile.

Our daughters, Ella and Mabel, are uncertain what to make of their new home, but there is a river here, and that is a good thing.

Mike DeGrandpre is in Concepcion, Chile on sabbatical leave from the University of Montana.

Posted in Updates | Comments Off

The following is a cross-post from orvisnews.com, a blog detailing Orvis’s efforts in conservation:

by Eric Rickstad

As part of our Orvis Commitment to Protect Nature, we’ve joined forces in 2011 with the Clark Fork Coalition and Trout Unlimited to jump start restoration in the Upper Clark Fork watershed.

Upper Clark Fork

Restoration of spawning creeks is vital to the health of the Clark Fork River.

You can team with Orvis to help restore vital spawning tributaries Cottonwood, Racetrack, and Rock creeks. In a matching funds grant with a goal of $60,000, we’ll match your contribution dollar for dollar. The restoration work focuses on flow restoration, fish passage, connectivity, habitat enhancement, and forest-watershed management projects with the goal of achieving complete, long-lasting health for these vital spawning tributaries.

The first plan of action will be to identify and analyze fish passage barriers in the key watersheds that prevent migratory fish from accessing spawning grounds. Bull trout and westslope cutthroat have been found in several irrigation in the Upper Clark Fork River basin. Their sampling represents a fraction of the irrigation ditches in use by private landowners. TU staff will be working with Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks to contact private landowners, survey selected ditches and investigate headgate structures. Depending on ditch size, location and seasonal usage, fish screens may be appropriate to stop the entrainment of native species. Survey work will help determine the feasibility and type of structure to be installed. This information will be used to prioritize fish passage restoration projects and plan bypass structures and/or fish screens along irrigation ditches, as appropriate, in order to begin to establish multiple, interconnected populations in the upper watershed.

The Creeks:

Racetrack Creek: Potential flow restoration projects by the Clark Fork Coalition have the potential to dramatically improve conditions in this stream. According to MT Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Racetrack Creek is one of four top-ranked priorities for restoration because of its high fishery value, but the lower six miles of Racetrack have dewatering issues in late summer.

Cottonwood Creek: Cottonwood Creek is disconnected from the Clark Fork by severe dewatering most years, in both the summer and winter. The fishery includes a significant conservation population of westslope cutthroat trout in the upper stretches, and has received a Fish Key Watershed” designation by US Forest Service. By increasing water flow, the Clark Fork Coalition hopes to re-connect the creek to the Clark Fork during low water events.

Rock Creek: The upper stretches of this renowned blue-ribbon trout stream—and principal tributary to the Upper Clark Fork—have been designated as a “Fish Key Watershed” by the US Forest Service. “Fish Key Watersheds” represent strongholds for native fish that require greatest protection, and contain some of the most important future sources of native fish to use in repopulating restored tributaries and mainstem reaches. Rock Creek is one of the few remaining strongholds where bull trout thrive in the northern Rockies.

We’ll be posting updates of this and other projects quarterly, so you can keep track of the progress. Donate today and help this historic river.

Eric Rickstad is the Managing Editor of OrvisNews.com and Manager of Orvis Sporting and Conservation Communications. He is the author the the novel Reap published by Viking/ Penguin, and of the forthcoming novel Found. He fishes the Battenkill near his house as often as possible and lives in southern Vermont with his wife, daughter, and golden retriever.

Posted in Updates | Comments Off

First off, the good news: thanks to your calls and emails, the Clark Fork Coalition made gains for clean water at the 2011 Legislature.  The Coalition worked with sponsor Senator Ron Erickson to pass the “Septic Disclosure Act” by a vote of 39-11 from the Senate last week.  This bill, Senate Bill 191, would protect property buyers by ensuring they are provided with basic information about their septic system.

We feel this bill is a win-win for buyers, sellers, and water quality in the Clark Fork watershed.  Over one-third of Montanans use an on-site sewage treatment system in their homes.  A properly designed, constructed, and maintained septic system can provide long-term, effective treatment of household wastewater.  But a poorly maintained septic system degrades water quality in ground water, streams, and rivers—and can contaminate drinking water, especially if located near wells.

This bill aims to keep septics up to snuff by letting property owners know that they require regular maintenance and repair. It requires that a seller provide a disclosure statement, as well as any available county permits or maintenance records for the system. If all parties understand potential septic problems and/or costs up-front, then both buyers and sellers are better able to save resources, time, and even potential lawsuits down the road.  Next up for SB 191: a hearing in the House.

Meanwhile, on to defense—we have a tough road ahead of us this week.  The House and Senate are both voting on a host of bills that could potentially do permanent harm to the health of the Clark Fork basin.  Here’s a quick snapshot of what we’re working on.  YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING YOUR LEGISLATORS TODAY AND TELLING THEM YOU OPPOSE THE FOLLOWING BILLS.

Senate Bill 306: Cyanide Heap Leach Mining Expansion: OPPOSE

Yes, Montanans have voted not once, but TWICE to ban cyanide heap leach mining—but it’s back.  This bill would allow existing facilities to expand their cyanide processing for ore and tailings from new open-pit mines.  It will encourage all sorts of open-pit mines, big and small, that will scar our mountains and floodplains—particularly at risk are the Blackfoot and Rock Creek watersheds.  Plus, using more cyanide to process ore goes against the voters’ choice…and threatens water quality in Montana.  The cyanide bill hits the Senate floor this week for a full vote.  Email your senator TODAY and tell him/her you OPPOSE SB 306.

HOUSE BILL 433: Bad for Rivers. Bad for Water Rights: OPPOSE

GOOD NEWS! HB 433 just failed 32-67, which means MT Representatives voted on behalf of protecting water rights and rivers.

Exempt wells have been in the news lately, and the debate continues. This bill sanctions a “free giveaway” of our precious water resources.  It’s a blatant attempt to overturn a recent win, in which the Coalition and several Montana ranchers succeeded in compelling the state to re-write the problematic “exempt well rule.”  This rule allows developers to drill dozens or even hundreds of wells for a subdivision without a permit, leaving Montanans unable to manage our water resources.  Exempt wells are bad for rivers, bad for water right holders, and bad for Montana.  This bill would not only codify a bad rule, it would expand the permit exemption.  This bill will be in front of the full House this week.  Email your representative TODAY and tell him/her you OPPOSE HB 433.

Senate Bill 317:  Undermines Basic Environmental Protections: OPPOSE

This bill puts Montanans in the backseat for important future decisions.  It drastically weakens the Montana Environmental Policy Act, a tool that helps Montanans keep our state clean and beautiful. SB 317 changes the fundamental purpose, policy, requirements, and enforcement of our important law, and even limits state agencies from reviewing new studies or information related to impacts from a major project.  This bill will also be on the Senate floor this week.  Email your Senator TODAY and tell him/her you OPPOSE SB 317.

Senate Bill 312: Paves the Way for Corporate Mining Interests: OPPOSE

This bill will lead to faster permitting with less environmental review for new metal mines, as well as less review for existing mines looking to change their operating or reclamation plans.  It also hands corporate interests “veto power” over Montanans, because the Dept. of Environmental Quality would have to essentially ask the company’s permission before taking any precautions that safeguard clean water and communities.  With a long and expensive track record for irresponsible mining in the Clark Fork, we can’t afford this bill.  Email your Senator and tell him/her you OPPOSE SB 312.

Thank you for using your voice on behalf of clean water—we need you to help protect the remarkable ecological and community investment we’ve made in the Clark Fork basin over the past several decades.  We can’t do this work without you.

Posted in Updates | Comments Off

News and media outlets are already plowing full-steam into their coverage of the 2011 legislative session in Helena.  And at the Coalition, we’re also poised to offer members and interested citizens tools, tips, and resources for navigating the ins and outs of the decision-making process.

Want to contact your legislator? We have a list of legislators in the basin, including their districts and email addresses. Not sure of your legislator?  View our state-wide and city maps, find out your district, and then double-check our list to find your representative.

Or, use the Montana Legislative easy email contact form: http://leg.mt.gov/css/sessions/62nd/legwebmessage.asp

Meanwhile, stay up-to-date with the latest from the legislature by signing up for our email alerts or visiting our Latest Legislative News pages.  And, bookmark our ‘What’s Hot’ section of the site, and check back to our progress on important bills moving through the House and Senate.

This week’s Hot Item:

The Coalition is supporting House Bill 28 (HB 28), which proposes to revise requirements for septic mixing zones.  The new requirements would require that septic mixing zones be located wholly within the subdivision where the drainfield is located.  Improperly situated or overloaded septic drain fields can cause excess nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, to leach from fields into our waterways, causing unwanted algae.  HB 28 will mandate better placement of septic drain fields, improving water quality in the Clark Fork basin.

HB 28, introduced by Walter McNutt, will have a hearing January 17 in the Natural Resources Committee.  Use the Montana Legislature’s online email form to let your legislator on this committee know that you support HB 28. http://leg.mt.gov/css/sessions/62nd/legwebmessage.asp, or use your personal email.

Natural Resources Committee:

Gordon Hendrick (HD 14) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Gerald (Jerry) Bennett (HD 1) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Wendy Warburton (HD 34) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Mike Miller (HD 84) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Cleve J Loney (HD 25) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Alan Hale (HD 77) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Bill Harris (HD 30) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Pat Connell (HD 87) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Kelly Flynn (HD 68) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Michele Reinhart (HD 97) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Betsy Hands (HD 99) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Dick Barrett (HD 93) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Kathleen Williams (HD 65) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Virginia Court (HD 52) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Brian Hoven (HD 24) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The session’s just begun, but we’ve already outlined our list of recommendations for 2011. As new bills and action items surface, we’ll be sure we’re adhering to our goals for clean water in the Clark Fork basin.  Want to help keep us accountable?  Shoot us an email at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

2011 Recommendations:

1.    PROTECT SENIOR WATER RIGHTS: Continue the state’s long tradition of protecting senior water rights holders under the Prior Appropriation Doctrine:

a.    Do not expand the exemption for permit-exempt wells.

b.    Do not create an exemption for coal bed methane (CBM) companies to sell and market water.

c.    Support aquifer recharge and reinjection for CBM production to avoid depleted aquifers.

2.   SAFEGUARD OUR CLEAN WATER:

a.    Encourage responsible natural gas development by requiring companies to disclose the contents of toxic hydraulic fracturing fluids.

b.    Protect property owners, drinking water, and groundwater by passing the “Septic Disclosure Act,” to require sellers to provide information related to the septic system.

c.    Expand the “Aquatic Invasive Species Act” to curtail the harmful and costly spread of invasive plants and animals in our waterways.

Want to learn more about how work is done at the capitol? Join us on February 17 for a Legislative Update and Social at the Coalition offices in downtown Missoula.  Email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it for details.

Posted in Updates | Comments Off
New channel at confluence

The Clark Fork enters its restored channel at Milltown

On December 16, 2010, the Clark Fork River was diverted from a bypass channel into a newly restored home at its confluence with the Blackfoot.  Over a hundred people gathered under a bluebird sky to watch as this hard-working river slowly returned to its original channel and floodplain.

It hasn’t been an easy century for the Clark Fork River, by any stretch.  Fish and wildlife have perished in its polluted waters.  Mining waste and contamination once turned the river red.  Flooding created a massive pileup of toxic sediments behind Milltown Dam.  Trash and old car bodies once riddled its banks.

Yet, despite this history of harms, something brought us together to start picking up the pieces on the Clark Fork.  After the ice jams at Milltown in 1996, and the subsequent fish kills, many realized that something needed to give.  The river needed healing.  And there were people who wanted to help.

In 2010, much of the story of the Clark Fork’s recovery remains unwritten.  We’ve penned its first few chapters—the restoration and return of native trout to its headwaters at Silver Bow Creek; dam removal, remediation, and restoration at Milltown; and a Superfund designation on 44 miles of the upper Clark Fork that will bring a large-scale recovery effort to this battered stretch of the mainstem.

With the removal of Milltown, the door is now wide open for a globally-significant, large-scale restoration of the Clark Fork.  Now, fish can move from its lower stretches up into historic spawning habitat in the Blackfoot, Rock Creek, and Upper Clark Fork.  Tons of contaminated sediments are gone, and the river is functioning much closer to its historic flow and form.

There are many more milestones to ahead for the Clark Fork, and the Coalition is at the forefront of the ongoing, top-to-bottom restoration effort.  Already, we’re putting resources into smaller creeks and streams in the upper Clark Fork, hoping to augment the federal cleanup on the mainstem.  We believe this watershed-wide endeavor will bring not only long-lasting ecological benefits, but economic boons as well—in the form of good-paying jobs and enhanced recreation opportunities.

Thanks to all partners and supporters who have helped us in this effort.  You removed a dam—and you’re restoring a river.  We couldn’t do this work without you.  Watch video and see photos on the day here.

Posted in Updates | Comments Off

The Coalition connected with watershed groups across the nation last week during a three-day training called Warming Watersheds: Water, Energy and Climate.  The training, offered by River Network, explored a hot new conservation strategy for addressing the impacts of climate change—the “water-energy nexus.”

As the Coalition illustrated in our 2008 report, Low Flows, Hot Trout, global climate change has local implications for the Clark Fork basin.  Since 1950, average temperatures in our area have increased about 1 degree in the Kalispell area, and closer to 2 degrees in Butte and Missoula.  More precipitation is falling as rain instead of snow throughout the basin, leading to decreased snowpack, earlier spring runoff, and lower flows in the warmest summer months.

Trout species have shifted markedly.  Take blue-ribbon fishery Rock Creek, for instance: rainbow trout once outnumbered brown trout, but now the reverse is true.  While species shifts can be attributed to additional factors beyond climate change, studies estimate that due to warmer temperatures alone, we could lose between 5 to 30% of trout habitat in western Montana over the next century, and sensitive species like bull trout could simply disappear.

But as research associated with the water-energy nexus illustrates, there are exciting possibilities for reducing carbon emissions, as well as saving energy and water, by using water conservation strategies.

For example, the current carbon footprint in the U.S. associated with moving, treating, and heating water is close to 300 million metric tons a year, and expected to grow.  Because of climate change, models predict that we’ll see increased demand for water across all sectors as groundwater and surface water sources decrease—exacerbating already stressful water supply problems.  These predicted water shortages have significant implications for the cost of our energy, too.

Check out this snippet from the River Network’s report, “The Carbon Footprint of Water”: “As the US struggles to reduce its carbon emissions in response to global warming, investments in water conservation, efficiency, reuse, and Low Impact Development (LID) are among the largest and most cost effective energy and carbon reduction strategies.”

For more information on the Water-Energy Nexus, please visit the River Network website.

Stay tuned to clarkfork.org for updates on our emerging work on the nexus and our Climate Action in the Clark Fork program.

Posted in Updates | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

In November, a state court judge signed off on an agreement between Montana ranchers and the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) over something called “permit-exempt wells.”

This agreement means that the DNRC must now change the rule that governs construction of these types of water wells, and—most importantly—it closes a 17-year-old loophole that accelerated the pace of development in rural areas, and opened the door to unregulated pumping of aquifers.

At the Coalition, we view this settlement as a big victory.  And it’s a critical first step towards removing a looming threat to rivers, streams, and water rights in Montana.

But really … what does it all mean?  And just what is an exempt well?

Well, simply put, an exempt well is a single, small well—small enough that a landowner doesn’t need a water use permit to put one on his or her property.  Specifically, Montana law allows for a well that pumps 35 gallons per minute (enough to run 8 showers simultaneously) to be dug without a permit.

Typically, landowners dig these permit-exempt water wells because their land is not serviced by a public water utility, meaning they need a water source for their household.   Historically, the impact of these single wells on Montana’s water resources has been mostly insignificant.

However, problems have arisen in recent decades because of the “exempt well loophole.”  Some developers have exploited a loophole that allows them to build subdivisions (and dig wells) without applying for well permits. The exempt well statute states that a water user must apply for a permit only if there is a “combined appropriation,” but the DNRC’s rule claims that a “combined appropriation” exists only if the wells are physically connected together.

Therefore, the DNRC’s interpretation of the statute had allowed a developer to place dozens (or even hundreds) of single, unconnected exempt wells in the same vicinity, without needing to apply (or pay) for a water permit.  Hence, the loophole.

Exempt wells imageThis image (left) shows hundreds of exempt wells placed side by side in a subdivision, illustrating how this loophole could dramatically deplete water resources.  And in Montana, seniority rules when it comes to water rights.  If a person has a senior (older) water right, he or she is entitled to that right over any other junior user.

So, when developers put in hundreds of exempt wells at a time, they are, in a sense, taking water away from senior water rights holders outright.  For this reason, the Coalition (a senior water right holder on our ranch in the upper Clark Fork) joined ranchers from the Yellowstone and Gallatin river basins to ask the DNRC to re-write the “exempt well rule” to better reflect the original intent of the statute.

November’s victory means the first step in removing a threat to Montana’s rivers and ranchers.  This agreement means that the ranchers and the DNRC have acknowledged that it was never the intent of the Montana Water Use Act to allow the depletion of water resources through the cumulative impact of hundreds of exempt wells, and the “exempt well rule” needs to be revised to reflect the impact that hundreds of single, unconnected wells can have in a particular area.  And it sets a time limit of 15 months for the DNRC to put a new rule in place.

The DNRC plans to hold a series of public meetings beginning next spring to discuss how to amend the exempt well rule.  Stay tuned to this website for meeting dates and times.  To learn more about exempt wells, please visit www.clarkfork.org/take-action/exempt-wells.html.

Posted in Updates | Comments Off

The results are in for Election 2010: next up, the four-month Legislative Session in Helena, where the action really unfolds.

Starting January 3rd, the Coalition will focus much of our watershed protection energy toward Helena, where Legislators will be making important decisions every day that affect the future of our rivers and communities.

With the state facing an almost $400 million budget shortfall, we’re expecting that the 2011 session will hold plenty of challenging choices for Legislators, as well as the constituents who elected them.

But one choice should be simple up at the Capitol: clean water. To us, clean water isn’t a political value.  It’s a necessity.

Montanans living in the Clark Fork basin agree—clean water and open space are why we live here.  Time and again, surveys show that people prioritize protecting our right to hunt and fish, our working landscapes, and our natural-resource-based economies.

Although we might not always agree on the best way to conserve and protect our resources, the first step to creating stream-smart policies and tools is starting on the same page with all sides of the political spectrum. At the Coalition, we believe that “page” is an acknowledgement that protecting clean water is common sense.

The Clark Fork Coalition and our members will have the opportunity to engage our elected representatives in the shared vision of a fully restored and revitalized Clark Fork basin.  We take our job as a community-based watershed group seriously, and are dedicated to keeping you in the loop throughout the session so that you know when to voice support for—or opposition to—bills that will affect our streams and rivers.

While it’s hard to predict exactly what we’ll see at the Capitol this winter, the Coalition has a slate of bills we’re watching closely, and we’ll help you track them, too.  Here are the priorities that rise to the top for the Coalition this Legislative Session:

* We’ll work to protect and uphold the Montana Water Use Act to protect water right holders, streamflows, and community water supplies.

* We plan to spearhead and support the ‘Septic-Right-To-Know Act’ that requires a disclosure of the status of individual septic systems during a property sale.

* We’ll support a bill that requires septic mixing zones (such as drainfields) to remain within the property boundary where the system is installed.

* And, of course, we’ll work to protect Montanans’ right to a clean and healthful environment, and support bills that protect riparian resources and water quality.

Get Involved:

>> Visit the Coalition’s Take Action page frequently for updates to our legislative work.

>> Join us in Missoula at our offices on February 17 for a Legislative Update and Social (with the all-important pizza and beer)

>> Tag along for River Lobby Day in Helena on March 18.

Posted in Updates | Comments Off

Last Monday was a big day at the Coalition-owned Dry Cottonwood Creek Ranch in the upper Clark Fork valley.  Over 50 students from 9th, 11th, and 12th grades at Powell County High School visited the ranch for the first half of the Coalition’s “Hands on the Ranch” program, and spent a gorgeous fall day gathering field data from different areas of the property.

The theme of the day was science—gathering data, taking notes, and trying out theories.  The Coalition is working hard to improve stream health on the small creek—called Dry Cottonwood Creek—that runs through the property, so students were asked to give us an assessment of riparian well-being, and let us know how they thought things were going on the ground.

They went to work quickly and thoroughly—and ended up producing a riparian assessment for Dry Cottonwood Creek using a methodology adapted from the Natural Resource Conservation Service.  About half of the 50 students analyzed the state of the creek at the lower end near its confluence with the Clark Fork River, while the other half went about two miles upstream to check out creek health in the upper stretches.  The students quantified a variety of impacts to the stream, including: the amount of erosion on the stream banks, the extent of trampling damage, the number and types of riparian trees and shrubs, the type of substrate in the creek, the scope of browsing damage on plants, and more.  Finally, the students tallied up scores and gave each section of the creek an overall rating.

And the day didn’t end there.  Lots of students had plenty of ideas as to why the creek might not be as healthy as it could be.  It might be that noxious weeds are choking out the native plants.  Or, livestock coming down to water might be causing bank erosion and sediment to pile up in the creek.  Maybe there isn’t enough water in the creek.  Maybe we need to plant more willows to stabilize the streambanks.

But, like a few ninth-graders pointed out to Ranchlands Program Manager Bryce Andrews, things seem to be getting a little bit better.  The new fencing that Bryce put in this past spring seems to be keeping livestock impacts in check on the lower stretches.  And, like one 12th grader noted, if we change the way we use the water to irrigate, maybe there will be more water for the stream.

At the end of the day, (after a quick creek jumping contest), everyone loaded up in the buses to head back into town.  But the Coalition’s “Hands on the Ranch” program doesn’t stop with last week’s assessment.  Next spring, this same group of 50 students from Powell Co. High will return to the ranch with a big task to complete.  We’ll be planting dozens of riparian shrubs and plants along the reaches of Dry Cottonwood Creek that seem most in-need of a little “native touch,” and the students will be right there with us, digging holes and spreading native seed to help give the creek a fresh start.

A big thanks to partners who made this project possible, including Matt Vincent with the Clark Fork Watershed Education Project, Jessica Anderson and Pat Bannon from Powell County High School, Stephanie LaPorte from Dan Spencer’s graduate-level EVST class, Renee Myers from the Watershed Restoration Coalition, Karen Laitala and Kristine Anderson from Powell County Weed District, Geoff Anderson from NRCS-Deer Lodge, and Brandi Steinebach from Deer Lodge County Conservation District.  , and to our funders, the Deer Lodge County Conservation District, the PPL Montana Community Fund, the Plum Creek Foundation, and the Steele-Reese Foundation.

Visit the Hands on the Ranch Photo Gallery

Posted in Updates | Tagged , , , | Comments Off


Best River Fest At the Clark Fork Coalition,
a day at the office can often feel like a whirlwind swim through Class IV rapids.  Between phones and email, meetings and letter-writing, project tours and presentations, it’s a lively and fast-moving environment for a team that works hard to build a better watershed.  Last Saturday, October 2, though, the pace changed to celebration mode, all day long, at our 25th Anniversary Party—aka, the Best River Fest .


And why not take an R&R day, we figured? We had a lot to celebrate with friends and supporters who have catapulted the organization forward this past quarter century, bringing our river back from back-alley dump to ribbon of life.  As those of you who joined us know, the afternoon simply could not have been better:  Great music from The Mission Mountain Wood Band, Lil’ Smokies, and Wartime Blues, 600 friends, 80 degrees and blue skies, the Bitterroot River rolling nearby, mayflies hatching in late afternoon light … in all, a spectacular day.


So we’d like to extend thanks —to all of you who joined us at the Best River Fest, and especially to board member Stuart Goldberg and his wife, Mindy Goldberg, who generously hosted this 25th Anniversary celebration at their property, The Farm at McCauley Butte.

Visit our Best River Fest Photo Gallery for links to photos on the day.

Posted in Updates | Comments Off